|
|
Post by Mahnarch on Jun 30, 2012 21:51:31 GMT -5
Due to the mental instability of the 'Honorable John Roberts' (whose suffering with mentally altering drugs due to his seizures) voted in favor of the the liberal mindset of Socialist/Marxist/Leninist/Hitlerist Medicine.
In 2007 the Wall Street Journal and New York Times posted articles about Roberts' drug problem when he was appointed by George W. Bush, in the hopes of bringing down a "right-wing conservative', but they have printed NOTHING about his drug problem when he voted in a way that was favorable to the Democratic Control ideology!
|
|
|
|
Post by Ordinaryguy on Jul 1, 2012 1:55:00 GMT -5
This will go down in history with Dred Scott and someday Roe v Wade as one of the worst decisions ever made by the Supreme Court.
|
|
|
|
Post by Classicblast on Jul 2, 2012 2:30:55 GMT -5
What about this makes some think its a good thing is what boggles my mind?!
|
|
|
|
Post by Phil on Jul 3, 2012 13:14:19 GMT -5
This whole thing is a lot of trouble. The court's job is to interpret law.... not make law.
Row vs Wade was a big case where judge Harry Blackman wrote the law. Here we have an example of a President writing a law and getting the backing of the court.
I made some videos discussing this. Its appalling that's all I can call it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Classicblast on Jul 3, 2012 21:43:28 GMT -5
I see, but in one of your videos you said about "drinking the Kool-aid" How long before these people realize this Kool Aid kills?
|
|
|
|
Post by Mahnarch on Jul 4, 2012 4:36:36 GMT -5
I agree.
It would also seem that the 23-30 age group is finally waking up, now that they're getting out of college and not being able to find a job.
OF COURSE, Obama fixes that with a new law that says the anyone under 30 who made at least $6700* and some change in those years is eligible for welfare.
*it's a specific amount that I can't remember right now. I'll find a relevant link later.
I'm sure Jersey could find it faster.
|
|
|
|
Post by Classicblast on Jul 5, 2012 0:46:12 GMT -5
I missed that one. YOu mean if you have a part time job you can be eligible for welfair? I will look into that but I think that's what you mean there.
For those keeping score. you who know me through this board, I was traded from the Huntsville Stars to the Mississippi Braves who I played my final two professional seasons for. At the end of 2009 they did not renew my contract.
In terminology of any other job they fired me. Ok, I was lucky to stick around that long. at the end of 2005 the Lookouts released me. I was effectively fired then but I got signed by the Stars just before training camp in February of 2006.
So what I am saying is there were periods of tiem I was not under contract and had not yet found employment in the private sector. I did not seek unemployment, I had salted some money for a rainy day and I lived off that until I found jobs. Had worse come to worst I could have moved back to northern NY state and worked with my brothers in construction. I tried not to because Blastgirl and our sons are home here. And I found suitable local employment so we stayed. Blastgirl understood we may need to move and she was ready to if that's what it meant for me to have work.
But there was a period of a lot of months where I had no job and was not taking any kind of unemployment either.
If these people can take assistance even while they're working part time they're not going to be highly motivated to look for more permanent work.
I would swear this administration wants us to be in the habit of depending on the government. If it's going how you suggested, and if I understood it right, the government is nurturing that already.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mahnarch on Jul 9, 2012 1:38:20 GMT -5
You have described it perfectly. Democrats are all for the "the little guy" [ie, the unemployed who are lazy]. Republicans are for "the little guy" [ie, those who want to work]. If Democrats can promise the lazy more money to vote for them, the more votes they will get. Democrats have been notorious for hiring buses that pick up homeless people and promising them food and water for (D) votes. Dems/Unions always put down the "Big Corporations", but who makes up these corporations? The 'Little Guy". What if; Thunderbird were to expand into his neighboring county. He hires 10 guys to run that outfit. It doubles his pay because of the extra work. According to Democrat Unions, he's now an "Evil Rich", even though he's spent years building the business. Dems say he "doesn't deserve his salary. DESERVE?!!! More like EARNED!! Social Health Care takes away from you and give to the those who choose NOT to earn. Where is Mr. Jersey?! I'm angry that he hasn't sounded off on this, yet! Some Personal Assistant he's becoming!  |
|
|
|
Post by Classicblast on Jul 9, 2012 1:55:29 GMT -5
That's a good description of things that once you hire workers the democrats and unions even if you're not a union organization, the unions still encourage labor to believe "The man" wants to keep you down.
I can't see it that way. "The Man" gave you a job and the chance to build your own next egg. My father started that construction business in 1964. Thunderbird/Terry has run it along with my other brother /Brad for about 20 years. For the last 10 my dad hasn't run matters there much at all. That business has about 100 employees, about 70 trucks. (all Fords) and numerous bulldozers, and other heavy equipment.
Most of the workers own their own home.
And taxes that business pays directly and indirectly. How about the 100 people that pay their payroll taxes beyond what the business pays?
|
|
|
|
Post by Phil on Jul 9, 2012 13:26:32 GMT -5
It all comes down to the old adage. 'if you give a man a fish you feed him for the day, if you teach him to fish you feed him for life'
My job is to teach my kids to fish. Metaphorically speaking.
The government is currently trying to make the people want to be given fish.
That does 2 things. It makes the public dependent on the government, but it also encourages the not so dedicated population to vote for the politicians who give out fish. I don't see that as a good thing but that's among the divided ways of our country today.
|
|
|
|
Post by Phil on Jul 11, 2012 12:34:11 GMT -5
The liberal views are suggesting that if you don't support Obamacare then you don't support any kind of health care at all.
Its different from that. This platform forces us to buy into Obamacare or be fined. And they can enforce the fines by taking it out of your tax return. HELLO
I don't see much democracy in that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mahnarch on Jul 14, 2012 0:58:06 GMT -5
Nice "Ford" plug, Classic! How "capitalist" of you! Let's hope no liberals see that in any future electoral runs!  Phil's "fish" example is perfect. I can't expand on it. Where is Mr. Jersey? He's about to be fired from my PA! |
|
|
|
Post by Classicblast on Jul 14, 2012 2:23:03 GMT -5
I believe in capitalism and I support the blue oval.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mahnarch on Aug 19, 2012 22:09:53 GMT -5
Here's the next Liberal/Union move:
Union bosses want to force ALL home care workers into Unions.
I am a home health care worker.
I am my mother's guardian.
I pay no fees.
I receive no pay.
The Union will force me to pay +/- $200/month to take care of my mother.
Where does the $200 go?!
To the Union bosses. The ones pushing this "law".
|
|
