Dont mind this thread.

[Jimbozo]

Oh Oh! I know this one.... uh.... Van Gogh!

[Hey Suburbia!]

Critique of Pablo Picasso “Vue de Notre-Dame de Paris - Île de la Cité.”

By Kurt Wilson
1. Write down three questions that come to your mind as you look at this artwork. :
-What city is this?
-Why are the buildings so awkwardly designed?
-How could someone paint like this?
2. Pablo Ruiz Picasso. Spanish. Paris. 26-February/1945. Oil on canvas. 80 x 120 cm. Museum Ludwig, Cologne; Donation Ludwig.
3.
4. This painting is an abstract/landscape.
5. To me the most important element of design in this painting is color. Without color this painting would just be a bland painting of a boring abstract city.

6. The focal point of this painting is the sidewalk in the bottom right corner. It leads the viewer’s eyes around the whole painting. There is some contrast with the blue water below the city.
7. The rhythm in this painting is seen at the bottom left corner. Near the bridge going over the water with its gentle arcs.
8. The artist has created a sense of balance in this painting through the use of all the buildings. Even though they are all awkwardly shaped and placed they still manage to stand and stay balanced.
9. The artist has created unity in this painting through the blended colors. They are all dull blues and whites creating a complete sense of peace and calm that unites the abstract city.

10. This work invokes a sense of peace in the viewer with its colors, but at the same time it invokes confusion and hurriedness with the crazy sidewalks of the abstract city.
11. The subject matter of this painting is the confusingly built city.
12. To me the title of this work does not add to its meaning because it is in French. And I do not understand French at all.
13. It was created to be admired by an audience and to be sold for a profit.
14. This painting was probably just created so it could be sold to any art connoisseur for some extra money.
15. Its art style appears to be a little bit of abstraction.
16. No, this artwork does not speak to me, mostly because I am not a big art fan.
17. I admire the balance this artwork has the buildings are so oddly stacked and placed in the city but they still seem somehow organized.
18. There is nothing really communicated in this artwork, it was probably just meant to be sold for some extra cash.
19. The best phrase to describe how I feel about this art work is” “It is visually well organized and has an exciting design.”
20. This piece of art is rated as good, because I see it as nothing spectacular but it definitely isn’t bad. There’s nothing really exciting about this painting.

---

No one delete this, Im going to use it so I can print my work at home.

[Hey Suburbia!]

Im using this thread yet again, leave it alone.

---

Integers
Positive integers are whole numbers greater than zero. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.... are all positive integers, while numbers less than zero are negative integers. -1, -2, -3, -4, -5, -6.... are all examples of negative integers. For every positive integer there is a negative integer.
You use integers all the time wether you know it or not, for example, when telling the temperature outside during winter you will say that it is minus ten out. Which is actually -10°C, an integer. Adding or subtracting opposite integers will always result in a sum of zero.















Adding integer examples: Subtracting integer examples:
(2)+(-3)=(-1) (2)-(-3)= 5
(-7) + (-2) = -(7 + 2) = -9 (27)-(-5)= 32
(-80) + (-34) = -(80 + 34) = -114



Reference: www.mathleague.com/help/integers/integers.htm#positiveandnegativeintegers

Its only half done, leave it alone.

[Matermine]

ooh! ooh!

The square root of 5! + 1 = 5 + .5 X 2?