|
Post by SF on May 16, 2006 20:45:56 GMT -5
I've got it! But I don't want to ruin anyone's fun so I'll just PM slippy the answer. I will tell you, looking up "angle" on wikipedia, combined with my TI-86's functions helped me solve it in less than twenty minutes, after half an hour of realizing that you can't do it using algebra...
EDIT: The answer is, in fact, a whole number.
|
|
|
Post by Geekthras (The Gizmo of Yore) on May 16, 2006 21:04:05 GMT -5
AAAAAAAAAAAK you psoted while I did. great idea! don't give anyone the answer. I got it after a longer time because I thought an angle was obtuse instead of acute.
-G2-
|
|
|
Post by Peon on May 16, 2006 21:23:46 GMT -5
Well, the top angle of the triangle on the bottom there HAS to be 160 because 180 - 20 = 160, and the combined angles of the top of the whole triangle HAS to be 130, because 180 - 50 - 130... all the other angles are somewhat variable.
|
|
|
Post by slippy0 on May 16, 2006 23:41:41 GMT -5
SodaFan got it right ;D (there is only one real answer, BTW) I'll post it later, pm me otherwise.
post your own now...
|
|
|
Post by roflstunts on May 17, 2006 17:28:30 GMT -5
Yeah, any |Real number between 0 and 130 will fit in the x spot.
EDIT - Didn't notice there was a second page. /failure
|
|
|
Post by im_an_alien on May 17, 2006 19:03:03 GMT -5
I edited your post and took out the pic so no one who doesn't want to see it gets the answer Stunts' Answer^^^If you want to see stunts' picture see here^^^
|
|
|
Post by slippy0 on May 17, 2006 23:37:08 GMT -5
its still not the answer... that was a joke...
*fwoosh*
|
|
Kimm
Moderator
Posts: 2,993
|
Post by Kimm on May 20, 2006 11:27:35 GMT -5
I was never very good at that obstract math business.
|
|
|
Post by Vanilla Ice on May 20, 2006 22:10:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by slippy0 on May 22, 2006 15:40:12 GMT -5
nope BTW, if you give a solution, can you please say how you got it? Cus the only way it looks to me like your getting these answers is by guessing and checking (which I said doesn't work for some reason)
|
|